15 CIR 203 (2006)
LOCAL UNION NO. 571, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF | ) | CASE NO. 1098 |
OPERATING ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO, | ) | |
) | ||
Petitioner, | ) | |
v. | ) | FINDINGS AND ORDER |
) | ||
THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, NEBRASKA, | ) | |
) | ||
Respondent. | ) |
Filed March 20, 2006
APPEARANCES:
For Petitioner: | Thomas F. Dowd |
Dowd Howard & Corrigan, L.L.C. | |
1411 Harney Street | |
Suite 100 | |
Omaha, Nebraska 68102 | |
For Respondent: | A. Stevenson Bogue |
3700 First National Tower | |
1601 Dodge Street | |
Omaha, NE 68102 | |
James R. Thibodeau | |
Deputy County Attorney | |
909 Omaha/Douglas Civic Center | |
1819 Farnam Street | |
Omaha, NE 68183 |
NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS:
This
action was brought by International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, Local
Union No. 571 (hereinafter, “Petitioner” or “
ARRAY:
The
parties have seven array counties in common. These counties are:
Neb.
Rev. Stat. § 48-818 provides that the Commission may establish or alter
the scale of wages, hours of labor, or conditions of employment, or any one or
more of the same. The Industrial Relations Act requires that the Commission
establish rates of pay and conditions of employment which are “comparable to
the prevalent wage rates and conditions of employment.” The language of the
Industrial Relations Act is extremely clear and concise. However, under the
Act, the manner in which the Commission is to determine what is
comparable to the prevailing wage rate is left for the most part to the
discretion of the Commission. See
The
Supreme Court also stated in Crete Educ.
Ass’n v. School Dist. of Crete, 193
The
Court of Industrial Relations should not be compelled to compare the same school
districts in every case that comes before it involving the same school
districts. The ultimate question is whether, as a matter of fact, the school
districts selected for comparison are sufficiently similar to the subject
district to fulfill the requirements of section 48-818, R.R.S. 1943. If they are
then there is no room for complaint. We are not prepared to say that merely
because one set of school districts was deemed adequate in one case, a different
set of school districts would necessarily be inadequate in a different case,
particularly where different evidence is adduced.
The Supreme
Court also found that its past opinion with regard to school districts was
equally applicable with regard to other governmental subdivisions. See
AFSCME Local 2088 v.
The weight of the evidence presented in the
instant case leans toward the exclusion of the City of
The Petitioner and the Respondent agreed to the placement of all but
three of the job matches. The three job matches in dispute are the VDT Operator
I in the department of the Clerk of the District Court, the Auditor in the
department of the
VDT
Operator I
The Petitioner argues that the VDT Operator I should be aligned with the
Clerk Typist I to keep a natural progression within the department. The
Petitioner further argues that the Clerk Typist I is the entry level position in
this contract, and the VDT Operator I is a position requiring a slightly higher
skill level. In order to keep the salary range for the Clerk Typist I below the
salary range for the VDT Operator I, the positions were aligned so that the VDT
Operator I would be making greater than 100% of the Clerk Typist I salary.
However, the Respondent argues that the VDT Operator I should be compared with
the Clerk Typist II to maintain the internal alignment and historical
relationship between the VDT Operator I and II.
According to Exhibit 73 and Exhibit 80, it
appears that the Clerk Typist I is in the lower pay grade of 04 and the VDT
Operator I is in a higher grade of G6. This is also evidenced by the fact that
the Clerk Typist I is currently making $9.18 to $12.25 and the VDT Operator I is
making $10.11 to $13.55, while the VDT Operator II and the Clerk Typist II are
both making $11.20 to $14.97. If the Commission aligns the VDT Operator I at
90% minimum and 91% maximum of the VDT Operator II salary (which is identical to
the salary of the Clerk Typist II), then the VDT Operator I will be making less
than the Clerk Typist I. Currently,
the Clerk Typist I appears to be in a lower pay grade than the VDT Operator I,
so the VDT Operator I should not have a lower salary level than the Clerk Typist
I, in order to maintain the current internal alignment. Therefore,
since we have no evidence as to how to determine a higher salary range for the
VDT Operator I, we will align the positions of VDT Operator I and Clerk Typist I
at an equal salary level.
Auditor
The Petitioner argues that the Auditor should be aligned with the
Internal Audit Analyst to keep a natural progression and pay differential
between the jobs. The Respondent argues that because the Auditor does not
require a bachelor’s degree, the position should be aligned with an Accounts
Payable Specialist in the County Clerk/Comptroller Department.
The Internal Audit Analyst does require a
bachelor’s degree, whereas the other two positions do not require a
bachelor’s degree. Both the Accounts Payable Specialist and the Auditor are on
similar pay grades and have almost identical duties and responsibilities. Based
upon the job descriptions presented in Exhibits 75, 77 and 79, the Auditor
aligns more appropriately with the Accounts Payable Specialist than with the
Internal Audit Analyst. Therefore, the Commission will align the Auditor with
the Accounts Payable Specialist.
Scanner
Operator I
The
Petitioner argues that the Scanner Operator I in the Register of Deeds
Department should be aligned with the Scanner Operator in the District Court
rather than the Scanner/Microfilm Operator in the Department of Microfilm,
because the Petitioner’s expert felt that having five array matches in the
District Court was better than three array matches in the department of
Microfilm. However, the Respondent argues that the Scanner Operator I should be
aligned with the Scanner/Microfilm Operator in the Department of Microfilm
because the job duties are similar and the pay grades are identical. The
Respondent also argues that this alignment will maintain internal equity in the
current job structure.
Currently,
the Scanner/Microfilm Operator and the Scanner Operator I in the Register of
Deeds Department have identical pay ranges: $11.20 to $14.97; whereas, the
Scanner Operator in the District Court currently makes $9.18 to $12.25. Both the
Scanner/Microfilm Operator and the Scanner Operator I perform similar duties
according to Exhibits 74 and 76. Both job titles also have identical pay grades.
Therefore, the Commission will compare the Scanner Operator I in the Register of
Deeds Department to the Scanner/Microfilm Operator in the Microfilm Department.
WAGES
OR BENEFITS:
Longevity
Pay
The Petitioner argues that the Commission should not determine the prevalancy of longevity pay because it is a wage and not a fringe benefit. The Petitioner states that in 1992 to 1993 the Department of Labor changed longevity pay from a fringe benefit to a wage for calculation comparisons. The Respondent argues that longevity pay has always been considered a fringe benefit under Commission law and is subject to the two-pronged analysis of first determining whether the benefit was prevalent and then determining the midpoint.
In numerous cases since 1992 the Commission has
considered longevity pay as a fringe benefit for the purposes of calculating
comparability under § 48-818. See General
Drivers & Helpers Union, Local No. 554 v.
The prevalent practice in this case is to not
provide longevity pay.
FRINGE
BENEFITS:
Retirement
– Employer Contribution
According to Exhibit 29,
Based upon the evidence presented in Exhibit 29
and excluding the numbers for the City of
Health
Insurance
The
Petitioner argues that the County pays less in dollars for premiums for health
insurance than the other array counties. The Petitioner further argues that
because the County pays less in dollars, the Commission should not order a
percentage, but instead should consider the dollar amounts paid in premiums. The
Respondent argues that the health insurance percentages paid by the Employer
should be reduced.
The Commission has consistently found the prevalence of the array’s health insurance by comparing the percent of the premium to be paid by the employer and employee and not the actual dollar amounts. See IBEW, Local 1597 v. City of Gering, 15 CIR ___ (Issued November 3, 2005) and Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 24 v. City of Grand Island, 14 CIR 81 (2002). Therefore, the Respondent is above the comparable in that it pays 88% of the premium for family coverage, 88% of the premium for two-party coverage, and 97% of the premium for single coverage. It should decrease its percentage of premium paid for family coverage to 80% for the entire year, decrease its percentage of premium paid for two-party coverage to 77% for the entire year, and decrease its percentage of premium paid for single coverage to 95% for the entire year. See Table 3.
Moot
Fringe Benefits
While the Commission is not deprived of jurisdiction to set
wage rates after the end of the bargaining year in question, a dollar-for-dollar
costing out of each benefit is not required where, as here, the contract year in
dispute is already past, and the impossibility or impracticability of
retroactively changing fringe benefits for an expired contract year is well
recognized. See Lincoln Fire
Fighters v. City of Lincoln, 12 CIR 248 (1997), aff’d
253
1) Sick Leave – Number of Hours Earned Per Year;
2) Sick Leave – Conversion Applied to Vacation and Converted to Cash;
3) Sick leave – Cash Conversion upon Resignation, Dismissal, Retirement or Death;
4) Sick leave – Family or Funeral Usage;
5) Funeral leave;
6) Vacation Leave Schedule;
7) Vacation Leave – Cash Conversion;
8) Holidays and Personal Days;
9)
10) Health Insurance – Major Medical, Deductible, and Percentage Copay;
11) Health Insurance – Prescription Drug Coverage;
12) Health Insurance – Stop-loss For Major Medical;
13) Health Insurance – Optical Care;
14) Dental Insurance – Employer Paid;
15) Dental Insurance – Part of the Overall Health Premium;
16) Life Insurance – Amount of Basic Coverage;
17) Overtime;
18) Work Time for Overtime;
19) Disability Plan;
20) Union Dues Check-off;
21) Work Out of Class;
22) Work Conditions – Contract/Bargaining Law;
23) Work Conditions – Highly Urban/Formal Pay;
24) Retirement Plan- Defined Benefit Provisions.
Management
Prerogatives
There are certain fringes which we believe are management prerogatives and we will not address the following in this Order:
1) Work Time – Scheduled Hours per Day;
2) Work Time – Scheduled Hours per Week.
Benefits
Not Considered
The
Commission shall continue to determine comparability of health insurance, dental
insurance, and life insurance by comparing the percent of the premium to be paid
by the employer and employee. See also Lincoln Firefighters Ass’n Local 644 v. City of Lincoln, 12 CIR
248, 265 (1997); General Drivers &
Helpers Union Local 554 v.
The following benefits will not be considered according to the above rule:
1) Health Insurance − Monthly Premium;
2) Dental Insurance − Dollar Cost for Employer;
3) Dental Insurance Employee’s Monthly Cost;
4) Life Insurance − Monthly Premium per Employee.
Comparable
Fringe Benefits
The
following fringe benefits shall remain unchanged because they are comparable:
1) Vacation Accumulation – Respondent is comparable in that it allows the maximum accumulation of 240 carry-over vacation hours. It should maintain its maximum accumulation of vacation carry-over at 240 Hours. See Table 4;
2) Call-In Pay − Guaranteed Minimum 2 Hours Paid Time at 1.5 Rate;
3) Life Insurance − Percentage Paid by Employer;
4) Injured on Duty Pay − The Respondent will continue to not provide compensation for injured on duty pay.
Non-Comparable
Benefits
The Commission makes the following findings as to non-comparable fringe benefits:
1) Shift Differential − The Respondent is not comparable in that it allows only $0.25 differential for 2nd and 3rd shift. It should increase the shift differential pay to $0.34 for the 2nd and 3rd shift. See Table 5 ;
2) Educational Assistance Plan − See Table 6.
3) Dental Insurance Percentage paid by Employer − The Respondent is not comparable in that it pays 93% of individual dental insurance premiums and 85% of family dental insurance premiums. It should decrease its percentages paid for dental insurance premiums for individual coverage from 93% to 81% and for dental insurance premiums for family coverage from 85% to 72%. See Table 7;
4) Retirement − Percentage Contribution by Employer − See above and see Table 2;
5) Health Insurance − Percentage Paid by Employer – See above and see Table 3.
6) Longevity Pay Plan- See above and see Table 1.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that for the fiscal year 2004-2005, the following shall be effective as of July 1, 2004:
1) The job position of VDT Operator I shall be compared to the job position of the Clerk Typist I.
2) The job position of Auditor shall be compared to the job position of Accounts Payable Specialist.
3) The job position of Scanner Operator I in the Register of Deeds Department shall be compared to the job position of the Scanner/Microfilm Operator in the Microfilm Department.
4) Petitioner’s wages for the fiscal year 2004-2005 shall be as follows:
JOB
CLASSIFICATION
MIN
MAX
General Classes
Accounting
Clerk I
$12.42
$16.44
Accounting
Clerk II
$13.95
$18.71
Accounting
Clerk III
$15.29
$19.29
Administrative
Assis.
$15.40
$19.74
Cashier
$10.95
$15.49*
Clerk
I
$ 9.95
$13.81
Clerk
II
$12.10
$16.08
Clerk
III
$12.93
$17.15
Clerk
Typist I
$10.82
$14.76
Clerk
Typist II
$11.91
$15.92
Executive
Secretary
$15.92
$22.24
Receptionist/
Main
Desk Receptionist
$10.39
$14.00
Secretary
I (Confidential Corr)
$11.27
$15.15
Secretary
II (Confidential)
$12.49
$16.74
Secretary
III (Confidential)
$13.81
$18.52
VDT
Operator I
$10.82
$14.76
VDT
Operator II
$11.91
$15.92
County Assessor’s
Office
Administrative
Support Clerk
$13.48
$18.42
Assessor
Support Technician
$14.36
$18.72
Asst.
Mgr. GIS
$22.33
$29.21
CAD
Technician I
$15.04
$20.24
CAD
Technician II
$18.53
$24.94
GIS
Support Technician
$16.22
$20.67
Real
Estate Appraiser Tech. I
$15.81
$21.42
Real
Estate Appraiser Tech. II
$17.38
$23.67
Real
Estate Lister
$15.45
$18.38
Real
Estate Specialist
$19.66
$26.90
Tax
Auditor
$18.47
$24.78
County
Clerk/Comptroller’s Office
Accountant
II
$19.03
$25.91
Accountant
III
$19.64
$26.92
Accountant
IV
$22.27
$30.38
Accounts
Payable Specialist
$13.91
$18.70
Asst.
Supvr.-Records
$15.94
$21.14
Auditor
$13.91
$18.70
Internal
Audit Analyst
$18.47
$24.78
Oracle
Function Lead
$23.16
$32.18
Tax
Control Admin.
$22.27
$30.38
Tax
Control Clerk
$14.39
$19.30
Register of Deeds
Master
Cashier
$12.11
$16.62
Real
Estate Recorder
$12.50
$16.61
Scanner
Operator I
$11.87
$16.11
Senior
Real Estate Recorder
$15.32
$20.35
Clerk of the
District Court
Accounts
Analyst I
$13.12
$17.38
Accounts
Analyst II
$13.41
$18.29
Cashier-Child
Support
$12.50
$16.70
Cashier-Legal
$12.50
$16.70
Child
Support Specialist I
$12.99
$18.13
Comm.
Intake Specialist
$11.55
$15.36
Juvenile
Court Clerk
$11.55
$15.36
Legal
Clerk Typist-Writs
$13.81
$18.11
Legal
File Clerk
$11.17
$15.02
Program
Specialist II
$13.60
$18.53
Records
Specialist I
$11.55
$15.36
Scanner
Operator
$12.16
$16.39
County
Treasurer’s Office
Accounting
Specialist I
$13.53
$18.58
Accounting
Specialist II
$15.52
$20.41
Asst.
Vehicle License Clerk
$ 9.02
$12.51
Customer
Information Tech.
$12.95
$17.77
Customer
Service Specialist-Titles
$13.40
$18.74
Customer
Service Technician
$12.57
$16.86
Driver
$14.62
$17.52
Inventory
Control Technician
$14.85
$19.57
Master
Teller
$16.37
$20.26
Property
Tax Specialist
$12.91
$18.95
Election
Commissioner’s Office
Asst.
Election Board Coord.
$12.59
$16.97
Election
Board & Resource Coord.
$15.13
$22.40
Election
Specialist
$14.46
$19.43
Election
Technician
$12.59
$16.97
Jury
Coordinator
$15.46
$20.84
Civil
Process Server I
$14.05
$18.38
Civil
Process Server II
$15.61
$20.40
Civil
Process Technician II
$14.05
$18.38
Crime
Scene Investigator I
$15.61
$20.40
Crime
Scene Investigator II
$17.34
$22.67
Elevator
Operator
$10.64
$13.28
Entrance
Screening Officer
$13.05
$17.26
Law
Enforcement Technician I
$12.20
$16.57
Law
Enforcement Technician II
$14.97
$20.35
Motor
Vehicle Inspector
$10.33
$13.54
Property
& Evidence Technician
$12.66
$16.55
Property
& Evidence Technician II
$15.61
$20.40
Security
Officer
$13.04
$16.23
Security
Technician
$14.47
$18.02
Technical
Support Manager
$22.88
$31.41
Convention
Center/Visitor Bureau
Communications
Coordinator
$18.04
$24.12
Receptionist/Information
Spec.
$10.39
$14.00
Sr.
Convention Sales Rep.
$16.37
$22.71
Supervisor
of Convention Sales
$18.08
$25.07
Visitor
Services Mgr/Film Comm.
$16.37
$22.71
Corrections
Civilian Employees
Admin.
Receptionist
$10.39
$14.00
Clerk
III-Conf.
$12.93
$17.15
Commissary
Clerk
$12.93
$17.15
House
Arrest Support Serv. Aide
$13.51
$18.98
Librarian
$18.76
$26.10
Policy
Administrator
$22.00
$29.66
Records
Technician I
$11.00
$15.45
Records
Technician II
$12.17
$17.09
Records
Technician III
$16.67
$23.41
Staff
& Acct. Coordinator
$16.67
$23.41
Information
Services
AS/400
Technical Project Manager
$27.93
$38.34
Asst.
Data Entry Sup
$17.52
$23.02
Computer
Operator
$14.27
$18.74
Cont.
Clk/Data Entry Operator
$12.88
$16.96
Info
Center Spec.
$17.72
$22.60
LAN
Administrator
$23.37
$30.57
Network
Administrator
$23.37
$30.57
Operations
Technician
$17.72
$22.60
Progammer
Analyst
$21.50
$27.92
Senior
Systems Analyst
$25.31
$35.60
Shft
Supr of Computer Op
$18.33
$24.36
Systems
Analyst
$22.53
$31.46
Technical
Project Manager
$27.93
$38.34
Voice
Comm. Coordinator
$15.45
$19.35
Veteran’s
Services
Asst.
Service Officer
$17.96
$19.64
Senior
Asst. Service Officer
$20.72
$24.96
Purchasing
Asst.
Warehouse Supervisor
$14.37
$19.60
Parts
Room Clerk
$11.69
$15.50
Purchasing
Specialist
$14.37
$19.60
Warehouse
Worker
$11.69
$15.50
Community Services
Administrative
Assistant
$18.36
$28.26
Clinical
Service Clerk
$13.25
$17.32
Patient
Account Representative
$13.25
$17.32
Social
Services Technician I
$13.25
$17.32
Social
Services Technician II
$14.79
$19.84
Microfilm
Microfilm
Technician
$12.63
$16.61
Scanner/Microfilm
Operator
$11.87
$16.11
*Correct
amount taken from Exhibit 42, page 5.
5) The Respondent shall maintain
its maximum accumulation of vacation carry-over at 240 Hours.
6) The Respondent shall maintain its call-in-pay at a guaranteed minimum of 2 Hours Paid Time at 1.5 Rate.
7) The Respondent shall maintain paying 100% of a life insurance policy.
8) The Respondent shall continue to not provide compensation for injured on duty pay.
9) The Respondent shall increase the shift differential pay to $0.34 for the 2nd and 3rd shift.
10) The Respondent shall provide an educational assistance program that pays between $700 and $1000 dollars for tuition.
11) The Respondent shall decrease its percentages of dental insurance premiums paid for individual coverage from 93% to 81% and for family dental coverage from 85% to 72%.
12)
The Respondent shall increase
its percentage of contribution to the pension plan from 5.5% to 6.4% for the
entire year, only for the mathematical purpose of calculating an offset, using
the increase in the fringe benefit as an offset to the total amount to be
credited to the employees.
13) The Respondent shall decrease its percentage of health insurance premium paid for family coverage to 80% for the entire year, decrease its percentage of health insurance premium paid for two-party coverage to 77% for the entire year, and decrease its percentage of health insurance premium paid for single coverage to 95% for the entire year.
14) The Respondent shall eliminate its longevity pay plan.
15) The fringe benefit and wage offset, as found herein, shall be calculated on an individual employee basis. The Respondent shall determine the net lump sum overpayment or underpayment for the contract year for each employee. Any net lump sum underpayment for any employee shall be paid by the Respondent to each such employee, however, any employee reimbursement shall not exceed the amount of compensation owed to the employee from the Respondent.
16) Any adjustments in compensation resulting from this Order shall be paid in a single lump sum with the payroll checks issued next following the expiration of the Final Order’s time for appeal or sooner.
All other terms and conditions of employment are not affected by this Order.
For
copies of the Tables, please contact the Clerk of the Commission of Industrial
Relations, (402) 471-2934.